Nondominium - Revision history

TiberiusB at 18:07, 26 April 2024

2024-04-26T18:07:57Z

TiberiusB at 18:04, 26 April 2024

2024-04-26T18:04:14Z

TiberiusB at 18:04, 26 April 2024

2024-04-26T18:04:00Z

TiberiusB at 17:56, 26 April 2024

2024-04-26T17:56:44Z

TiberiusB at 17:27, 26 April 2024

2024-04-26T17:27:22Z

TiberiusB: /* Blockchain implementation */

2023-11-08T22:32:13Z

Blockchain implementation

TiberiusB: /* Example */

2023-11-08T22:32:03Z

Example

TiberiusB: /* See also */

2023-11-08T22:27:41Z

TiberiusB at 22:13, 8 November 2023

2023-11-08T22:13:52Z

TiberiusB at 18:42, 20 May 2023

2023-05-20T18:42:15Z

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 =Example=
-The [[Bitcoin]] Network is a great example of a shared asset under the ''nondominium'' [[property]] regime: no one can own it, in the traditional sense of the term. In fact, it is impossible to apply [[private property]] to the entire network. It is also important to note that there are no mechanisms to gain total control of the network without destroying the network, as trust in the network can only exist in a distributed manner. Also, [[private property]] operates within the network: minors own their computers. But no independent minor can offer the [[Bitcoin]] service of token transfer. [[Bitcoin]] as a utility is an emergent property of multiple minors sharing the same protocol. This emergent feature is a ''nondominium'' type of property. This is legally codifies as mutual or associative agreements. The role of the agent is separated into two: [[Custodian]] and [[Steward]]. The [[Custodian]] has passive foundational rights or veto (like a covenant or golden share) in accord with the founding purpose of the [[venture]]. It has the ability to say what you cannot do but cannot say what to do. The [[Steward]] is the active operator or developer of the venture's key assets. Remixed from a [https://www.thealternative.org.uk/dailyalternative/2022/12/5/chris-cook-non-dominium-sharing Chris Cook interview].
+The [[Bitcoin]] Network is a great example of a shared asset under the ''nondominium'' [[property]] regime: no one can own it, in the traditional sense of the term. In fact, it is impossible to apply right "in rem" or some type of [[private property]] to the entire network. It is also important to note that there are no mechanisms to gain total control of the network without destroying the network, as trust in the network can only exist in a distributed manner. Also, right "in rem" or [[private property]] operates within the network: minors own their computers. But no independent minor can offer the [[Bitcoin]] service of token transfer. [[Bitcoin]] as a utility is an emergent property of multiple minors sharing the same protocol. This emergent feature is a ''nondominium'' type of property. This is legally codifies as mutual or associative agreements.
-In another possible simple implementation, ''nondominium'' is a legal framework whereby all ownership rights and responsibilities over a [[resource]] are transferred to a [[Custodian]] established for that purpose. The [[Custodian]] acts in accordance with the [[Custodian Agreement]], which is comprised of a Charter to return a subset of the use rights to the individuals based on a predefined set of rules. This set of rules can be embodied as a [[benefits distribution algorithm]], which provides access to ''nondominium'' [[resources]] based on merit (or some other set of [[credentials]]), which is computed in real time based on past [[contributions]] or involvement in a [[project]] or [[venture]]. The [[Sensorica]] Montreal lab, where affiliates of the [[OVN]] perform hardware prototyping activities, is under the nondominium property regime. But the nondominium property regime of the lab is also enforced by the fact that the materials (consumables, tools and equipment) in the space is an aggregate composed of materials brought in by various individuals, some of which are under [[private property]] regime, others into a [[shared property]] regime (see more on [[inventory]]). If someone tries to enclose or capture these materials all the individual owners of these shared assets can pull the out, thus the lab, as a capacity for hardware prototyping dissipates.
+In another possible simple implementation, ''nondominium'' is a legal framework whereby all ownership rights and obligations over a [[resource]] are transferred to a trust, a [[Custodian]], established for that purpose. The [[Custodian]] acts in accordance with the [[Custodian Agreement]], which is comprised of a Charter to return a subset of the use rights to the individuals based on a predefined set of rules. This set of rules can be embodied as a [[benefits distribution algorithm]], which provides access to ''nondominium'' [[resources]] based on merit (or some other set of [[credentials]]), which is computed in real time based on past [[contributions]] or involvement in a [[project]] or [[venture]]. The [[Sensorica]] Montreal lab, where affiliates of the [[OVN]] perform hardware prototyping activities, is under the nondominium [[property]] regime. But the nondominium [[property]] regime of the lab is also enforced by the fact that the materials (consumables, tools and equipment) in the space is an aggregate composed of materials brought in by various individuals, some of which are under [[private property]] regime, others into a [[shared property]] regime (see more on [[inventory]]). If someone tries to enclose or capture these materials all the individual owners of these shared assets can pull the out, thus the lab, as a capacity for hardware prototyping dissipates.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 26 April 2024
Line 18:		Line 18:

	So ''nondominium'' is about a right "in personam" granted to a [[Custodian]] and to a [[Steward]], with no right "in rem" to anyone.		So ''nondominium'' is about a right "in personam" granted to a [[Custodian]] and to a [[Steward]], with no right "in rem" to anyone.
		+

	See also the [https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Nondominium p2p Wiki].		See also the [https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Nondominium p2p Wiki].

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 When it comes to rights, there are two types:
 * a right "in rem" (literally in the thing), a property right that has no name attached to it, acting as an independent object until we create an instrument that links it with a subject through a relationship (in the form of subject–predicate–object expressions). Ex. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fee_simple freehold ownership] that you can buy and sell.
-* a right "in personam", a property right that specifies rights and responsibilities for use, without rights to transfer (sell or buy), i.e. no absolute rights. Ex. Leasehold, rights to assign the lease but not to exchange; check or invoice, right to pass to someone else but not spend them directly.
+* a right "in personam", a property right that specifies rights and responsibilities for use, without rights to transfer (sell or buy), i.e. no absolute rights. Ex. Leasehold, rights to assign the lease but not to exchange; check or invoice, right to pass to someone else but not spend them directly. It usually corresponds to a responsibility placed on the mentioned person or group
 Remixed from a [https://www.thealternative.org.uk/dailyalternative/2022/12/5/chris-cook-non-dominium-sharing Chris Cook interview].
 See also the [https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Nondominium p2p Wiki].

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-''Nondominium'' is a new form of [[property]] applied to a resource It is a multistakeholder agreement that reframes property as relationships rather than things, specifying certain rights and obligations.
+''Nondominium'' is a new form of [[property]] applied to a [[resource]]. It is a multistakeholder associative agreement that re-frames property as relationships rather than things, specifying certain rights and obligations.
-We can say that under this property regime a resource owns itself or it is not owned by anyone (in traditional terms) but anyone has access to it, based on a predefined set of rules, specifying certain rights and obligations. The term ''autonomous resource'' is also used. It was first proposed by [[Chris Cook]] with the following original intention: "''Many indigenous peoples, such as American Indians and Australian Aborigines, find it impossible to understand how anyone can own land''". It is the expression ''find it impossible to understand'' that must be underlined here. Therefore nondominium is used for assets for which the notion of ownership cannot be applied: no one can own, even if they wanted to. - [https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/resilience/2013/01/16/submission-by-chris-cook-to-the-land-reform-review-group/ Reference]
+We can say that under this property regime a [[resource]] owns itself or it is not owned by anyone (in traditional terms) but anyone has access to it, based on a predefined set of rules, specifying certain rights and obligations. The term ''autonomous resource'' is also used. It was first proposed by [[Chris Cook]] with the following original intention: "''Many indigenous peoples, such as American Indians and Australian Aborigines, find it impossible to understand how anyone can own land''". It is the expression ''find it impossible to understand'' that must be underlined here. Therefore nondominium is used for assets for which the notion of ownership cannot be applied: no one can own, even if they wanted to. - [https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/resilience/2013/01/16/submission-by-chris-cook-to-the-land-reform-review-group/ Reference]
 See also the [https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Nondominium p2p Wiki].

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-''Nondominium'' is a new form of [[property]] applied to a resource, where the resource owns itself or it is not owned by anyone but anyone has access to it, based on a predefined set of rules. The term ''autonomous resource'' is also used. It was first proposed by [[Chris Cook]] with the following original intention: "Many indigenous peoples, such as American Indians and Australian Aborigines, find it impossible to understand how anyone can own land". It is the expression ''find it impossible to understand'' that must be underlined here. Therefore nondominium is used for assets for which the notion of ownership cannot be applied: no one can own, even if they wanted to. - [https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/resilience/2013/01/16/submission-by-chris-cook-to-the-land-reform-review-group/ Reference]
+''Nondominium'' is a new form of [[property]] applied to a resource It is a multistakeholder agreement that reframes property as relationships rather than things, specifying certain rights and obligations.
 See also the [https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Nondominium p2p Wiki].
@@ Line 6: / Line 8: @@
 =Example=
-The [[Bitcoin]] Network is a great example of a shared asset under the ''nondominium'' [[property]] regime: no one can own it, in the traditional sense of the term. In fact, it is impossible to apply [[private property]] to the entire network. It is also important to note that there are no mechanisms to gain possession of the network without destroying the network. Also, [[private property]] operates within the network: minors own their computers. But no independent minor can offer the [[Bitcoin]] service of token transfer. The [[Bitcoin]] service is an emergent property of multiple minors sharing the same protocol. This emergent feature is a ''nondominium'' type of property.
+The [[Bitcoin]] Network is a great example of a shared asset under the ''nondominium'' [[property]] regime: no one can own it, in the traditional sense of the term. In fact, it is impossible to apply [[private property]] to the entire network. It is also important to note that there are no mechanisms to gain total control of the network without destroying the network, as trust in the network can only exist in a distributed manner. Also, [[private property]] operates within the network: minors own their computers. But no independent minor can offer the [[Bitcoin]] service of token transfer. [[Bitcoin]] as a utility is an emergent property of multiple minors sharing the same protocol. This emergent feature is a ''nondominium'' type of property. This is legally codifies as mutual or associative agreements. The role of the agent is separated into two: [[Custodian]] and [[Steward]]. The [[Custodian]] has passive foundational rights or veto (like a covenant or golden share) in accord with the founding purpose of the [[venture]]. It has the ability to say what you cannot do but cannot say what to do. The [[Steward]] is the active operator or developer of the venture's key assets. Remixed from a [https://www.thealternative.org.uk/dailyalternative/2022/12/5/chris-cook-non-dominium-sharing Chris Cook interview].
-In another possible simple implementation, ''nondominium'' is a legal framework whereby all ownership rights over a [[resource]] are transferred to a [[Custodian]] established for that purpose. The [[Custodian]] acts in accordance with the [[Custodian Agreement]], which is comprised of a Charter to return a subset of the use rights to the individuals based on a predefined set of rules. This set of rules can be embodied as a [[benefits distribution algorithm]], which provides access to ''nondominium'' [[resources]] based on merit (or some other set of [[credentials]]), which is computed in real time based on past [[contributions]] or involvement in a [[project]] or [[venture]]. The [[Sensorica]] Montreal lab, where affiliates of the [[OVN]] perform hardware prototyping activities, is under the nondominium property regime. But the nondominium property regime of the lab is also enforced by the fact that the materials (consumables, tools and equipment) in the space is an aggregate composed of materials brought in by various individuals, some of which are under [[private property]] regime, others into a [[shared property]] regime (see more on [[inventory]]). If someone tries to enclose or capture these materials all the individual owners of these shared assets can pull the out, thus the lab, as a capacity for hardware prototyping dissipates.
+In another possible simple implementation, ''nondominium'' is a legal framework whereby all ownership rights and responsibilities over a [[resource]] are transferred to a [[Custodian]] established for that purpose. The [[Custodian]] acts in accordance with the [[Custodian Agreement]], which is comprised of a Charter to return a subset of the use rights to the individuals based on a predefined set of rules. This set of rules can be embodied as a [[benefits distribution algorithm]], which provides access to ''nondominium'' [[resources]] based on merit (or some other set of [[credentials]]), which is computed in real time based on past [[contributions]] or involvement in a [[project]] or [[venture]]. The [[Sensorica]] Montreal lab, where affiliates of the [[OVN]] perform hardware prototyping activities, is under the nondominium property regime. But the nondominium property regime of the lab is also enforced by the fact that the materials (consumables, tools and equipment) in the space is an aggregate composed of materials brought in by various individuals, some of which are under [[private property]] regime, others into a [[shared property]] regime (see more on [[inventory]]). If someone tries to enclose or capture these materials all the individual owners of these shared assets can pull the out, thus the lab, as a capacity for hardware prototyping dissipates.

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 =Blockchain implementation=
-[[Ricardian contracts]] can be used to put a material asset under the nondominium property regime. These assets can them form [[pools of shareable]].
+[[Ricardian contract]] can be used to put a material asset under the nondominium property regime. These assets can them form [[pools of shareable]].
 =See also=

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 =See also=
-* [[commons]]
+* [[Commons]]
-* [[pool of shareables]]
+* [[Pool of shareables]]
-* [[resource type]]
+* [[Resource type]]
 * [[Draft of the OVN Nondominium Agreement]] - old document
 * [http://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Nondominium Nondominium on P2P Foundation]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 The [[Bitcoin]] Network is a great example of a shared asset under the ''nondominium'' [[property]] regime: no one can own it, in the traditional sense of the term. In fact, it is impossible to apply [[private property]] to the entire network. It is also important to note that there are no mechanisms to gain possession of the network without destroying the network. Also, [[private property]] operates within the network: minors own their computers. But no independent minor can offer the [[Bitcoin]] service of token transfer. The [[Bitcoin]] service is an emergent property of multiple minors sharing the same protocol. This emergent feature is a ''nondominium'' type of property.
-In another possible implementation, ''nondominium'' is a legal framework whereby all ownership rights in a resources are transferred to a [[Custodian]] established for that purpose. The [[Custodian]] acts in accordance with the [[Custodian Agreement]], which is comprised of a Charter to return a subset of the use rights to the individuals based on a predefined set of rules. This set of rules can be embodied as a [[benefits distribution algorithm]], which provides access to ''nondominium'' [[resources]] based on merit (or some other set of [[credentials]]), which is computed in real time based on past [[contributions]] or involvement in a [[project]] or [[venture]]. The [[Sensorica]] Montreal lab, where affiliates of the [[OVN]] perform hardware prototyping activities, is under the nondominium property regime. But the nondominium property regime of the lab is also enforced by the fact that the materials (consumables, tools and equipment) in the space is an aggregate composed of materials brought in by various individuals, some of which are under private property regime, others into a shared property regime. If someone tries to enclose or capture these materials all the individual owners of these shared assets can pull the out, thus the lab, as a capacity for hardware prototyping dissipates.
+In another possible implementation, ''nondominium'' is a legal framework whereby all ownership rights in a resources are transferred to a [[Custodian]] established for that purpose. The [[Custodian]] acts in accordance with the [[Custodian Agreement]], which is comprised of a Charter to return a subset of the use rights to the individuals based on a predefined set of rules. This set of rules can be embodied as a [[benefits distribution algorithm]], which provides access to ''nondominium'' [[resources]] based on merit (or some other set of [[credentials]]), which is computed in real time based on past [[contributions]] or involvement in a [[project]] or [[venture]]. The [[Sensorica]] Montreal lab, where affiliates of the [[OVN]] perform hardware prototyping activities, is under the nondominium property regime. But the nondominium property regime of the lab is also enforced by the fact that the materials (consumables, tools and equipment) in the space is an aggregate composed of materials brought in by various individuals, some of which are under private property regime, others into a shared property regime (see more on [[inventory]]). If someone tries to enclose or capture these materials all the individual owners of these shared assets can pull the out, thus the lab, as a capacity for hardware prototyping dissipates.
 =See also=