Privacy - Revision history

TiberiusB: /* Zero knowledge proof */

2024-03-28T03:28:09Z

Zero knowledge proof

TiberiusB: /* Zero knowledge proof */

2024-03-28T02:58:35Z

Zero knowledge proof

TiberiusB: /* Zero knowledge proof */

2024-03-28T02:56:11Z

Zero knowledge proof

TiberiusB: /* Holoptism vs Panoptism */

2024-03-28T02:33:15Z

Holoptism vs Panoptism

TiberiusB: /* Holoptism vs Panoptism */

2024-03-28T02:32:11Z

Holoptism vs Panoptism

TiberiusB: /* Holoptism vs Panoptism */

2024-03-28T02:31:33Z

Holoptism vs Panoptism

TiberiusB at 02:31, 28 March 2024

2024-03-28T02:31:07Z

TiberiusB: /* Holoptism vs Panoptism */

2024-03-28T02:29:36Z

Holoptism vs Panoptism

TiberiusB: /* Holoptism vs Panoptism */

2024-03-28T02:28:28Z

Holoptism vs Panoptism

TiberiusB: /* Holoptism vs Panoptism */

2024-03-28T02:27:50Z

Holoptism vs Panoptism

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 ''Anoptism'' is deliberately created (as a feature) in anonymous [[organizations]] like the Anonymous, 4chan, forums on the Dark Web, etc. ''Anoptism'' is preferred over panoptism or holoptism in situations where privacy, autonomy, and individual freedom are prioritized. ''Anoptism'' emphasizes the importance of limiting surveillance and maintaining personal boundaries, allowing individuals to control their visibility and exposure to others.
-==Zero knowledge proof==
+=Zero-knowledge proof=
 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-knowledge_proof Remixed from Wikipedia]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 28 March 2024
Line 57:		Line 57:

	In other words, there is a 4th possibility to create an economic system of responsible agents where privacy is preserved. This can be possibly extended to economic processes, where predictability and trust can be established without seeing the whole picture. This is an intermediary position between ''holoptism'' and ''anoptism'', where one can predict the outcome of actions in a [[process]], and plan participation with respect to one's goals, without the need to access rich information about the other participants or the process as a whole.		In other words, there is a 4th possibility to create an economic system of responsible agents where privacy is preserved. This can be possibly extended to economic processes, where predictability and trust can be established without seeing the whole picture. This is an intermediary position between ''holoptism'' and ''anoptism'', where one can predict the outcome of actions in a [[process]], and plan participation with respect to one's goals, without the need to access rich information about the other participants or the process as a whole.
		+
		+
		+	This is preferable in situations where anoptism is preferred (see above), but it allows a more complex dynamic, ability to self-organize by supporting stigmergy. It would be interesting to compare ''holoptism'' with this situations, cons and pros...

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 28 March 2024
Line 50:		Line 50:

	==Zero knowledge proof==		==Zero knowledge proof==
−	~~A cryptographic technology~~ that ~~allows~~ one to ~~verify~~ a ~~claim without exposing~~ the ~~data~~ that ~~constitutes~~ that ~~claim~~.	+	[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-knowledge_proof Remixed from Wikipedia]
		+
		+	: In cryptography, a zero-knowledge proof or zero-knowledge protocol is a method by which one party (the prover) can prove to another party (the verifier) that a given statement is true, while avoiding conveying to the verifier any information beyond the mere fact of the statement's truth. In light of the fact that one should be able to generate a proof of some statement only when in possession of certain secret information connected to the statement, the verifier, even after having become convinced of the statement's truth, should nonetheless remain unable to prove the statement to third parties.
		+	: Research in zero-knowledge proofs has been motivated by authentication systems where one party wants to prove its identity to a second party via some secret information (such as a password) but doesn't want the second party to learn anything about this secret.
		+	: One of the uses of zero-knowledge proofs within cryptographic protocols is to enforce honest behavior while maintaining privacy. Roughly, the idea is to force a user to prove, using a zero-knowledge proof, that its behavior is correct according to the protocol. Because of soundness, we know that the user must really act honestly in order to be able to provide a valid proof. Because of zero knowledge, we know that the user does not compromise the privacy of its secrets in the process of providing the proof.
		+
		+	In other words, there is a 4th possibility to create an economic system of responsible agents where privacy is preserved. This can be possibly extended to economic processes, where predictability and trust can be established without seeing the whole picture. This is an intermediary position between ''holoptism'' and ''anoptism'', where one can predict the outcome of actions in a [[process]], and plan participation with respect to one's goals, without the need to access rich information about the other participants or the process as a whole.

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 Peer groups are characterized by ''holoptism'', i.e. the ability for any member to have horizontal knowledge of what the others are doing, but also the vertical knowledge related to the aims of the [[project]].
-: ''Holoptism is the implied capacity and design of P2P [[processes]] that allows participants free access to all the information about the other participants; not in terms of privacy, but in terms of their existence and [[contributions]] (i.e. horizontal information) and [[access]] to the aims, metrics and [[documentation]] of the [[project]] as a whole (i.e. the vertical dimension). This can be contrasted to the panoptism which is characteristic of hierarchical projects: processes are designed to reserve 'total' knowledge for an elite, while participants only have access on a 'need to know' basis. However, with P2P [[projects]], [[communication]] is not top-down and based on strictly defined reporting [[rules]], but [[feedback|feedback system]] is systemic, integrated in the protocol of the collaborative/cooperative system.''
+: ''Holoptism is the implied capacity and design of P2P [[processes]] that allows participants free access to all the information about the other participants; not in terms of privacy, but in terms of their existence and [[contributions]] (i.e. horizontal information) and [[access]] to the aims, metrics and [[documentation]] of the [[project]] as a whole (i.e. the vertical dimension). This can be contrasted to the panoptism which is characteristic of hierarchical projects: processes are designed to reserve 'total' knowledge for an elite, while participants only have access on a 'need to know' basis. However, with P2P [[projects]], [[communication]] is not top-down and based on strictly defined reporting [[rules]], but [[feedback system|feedback]] is systemic, integrated in the protocol of the collaborative/cooperative system.''
 Therefore ''panoptism'' creates an informational asymmetry between groups of people, with a elite group having access to more information on the rest of the people, reinforcing their position of power or influence. ''Holoptism'', on the other side, creates a plane level field for everyone, as no one can access more information than the rest. Thus the differentiator becomes ones ability to make sound decisions. This is coherent with the [[equipotentiality]] principle in p2p, i.e. considering that every peer has the same potential, which doesn't mean that every peer can fully develop and instantiate/realize that potential.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:32, 28 March 2024
Line 28:		Line 28:


−	''Holoptism'' is a necessary condition for [[stigmergy]], which is the primary mode of coordination in p2p. As a corollary of this statement, [[~~self-organisation\|~~Theoretical framework - living systems]] is also enabled by ''holoptism''.	+	''Holoptism'' is a necessary condition for [[stigmergy]], which is the primary mode of coordination in p2p. As a corollary of this statement, [[Theoretical framework - living systems\|self-organisation]] is also enabled by ''holoptism''.

	Another link between ''holoptism'' and the [[OVN model\|OVN]] is through the fundamental principles of [[transparency]], defined as free access to information about all actions or [[processes]] within the [[OVN]]. This is further reinforced by the principle of [[openness]], which means free access to participate in any [[process]]. In other words, p2p economics prescribes not only free access to information, but also free access to action, i.e. to do something with that information. The economic rationale is described on the [[economic model]] page, look for Ronals Coase and Yochay Benkler.		Another link between ''holoptism'' and the [[OVN model\|OVN]] is through the fundamental principles of [[transparency]], defined as free access to information about all actions or [[processes]] within the [[OVN]]. This is further reinforced by the principle of [[openness]], which means free access to participate in any [[process]]. In other words, p2p economics prescribes not only free access to information, but also free access to action, i.e. to do something with that information. The economic rationale is described on the [[economic model]] page, look for Ronals Coase and Yochay Benkler.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:31, 28 March 2024
Line 25:		Line 25:
	: ''Holoptism is the implied capacity and design of P2P [[processes]] that allows participants free access to all the information about the other participants; not in terms of privacy, but in terms of their existence and [[contributions]] (i.e. horizontal information) and [[access]] to the aims, metrics and [[documentation]] of the [[project]] as a whole (i.e. the vertical dimension). This can be contrasted to the panoptism which is characteristic of hierarchical projects: processes are designed to reserve 'total' knowledge for an elite, while participants only have access on a 'need to know' basis. However, with P2P [[projects]], [[communication]] is not top-down and based on strictly defined reporting [[rules]], but [[feedback\|feedback system]] is systemic, integrated in the protocol of the collaborative/cooperative system.''		: ''Holoptism is the implied capacity and design of P2P [[processes]] that allows participants free access to all the information about the other participants; not in terms of privacy, but in terms of their existence and [[contributions]] (i.e. horizontal information) and [[access]] to the aims, metrics and [[documentation]] of the [[project]] as a whole (i.e. the vertical dimension). This can be contrasted to the panoptism which is characteristic of hierarchical projects: processes are designed to reserve 'total' knowledge for an elite, while participants only have access on a 'need to know' basis. However, with P2P [[projects]], [[communication]] is not top-down and based on strictly defined reporting [[rules]], but [[feedback\|feedback system]] is systemic, integrated in the protocol of the collaborative/cooperative system.''

−	Therefore ''panoptism'' creates an informational asymmetry between groups of people, with a elite group having access to more information on the rest of the people, reinforcing their position of power or influence. ''Holoptism'', on the other side, creates a plane level field for everyone, as no one can access more information than the rest. Thus the differentiator becomes ones ability to make sound decisions. This is coherent with the [[~~equipopentiality~~]] principle in p2p, i.e. considering that every peer has the same potential, which doesn't mean that every peer can fully develop and instantiate/realize that potential.	+	Therefore ''panoptism'' creates an informational asymmetry between groups of people, with a elite group having access to more information on the rest of the people, reinforcing their position of power or influence. ''Holoptism'', on the other side, creates a plane level field for everyone, as no one can access more information than the rest. Thus the differentiator becomes ones ability to make sound decisions. This is coherent with the [[equipotentiality]] principle in p2p, i.e. considering that every peer has the same potential, which doesn't mean that every peer can fully develop and instantiate/realize that potential.

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 ''Holoptism'' is a necessary condition for [[stigmergy]], which is the primary mode of coordination in p2p. As a corollary of this statement, [[self-organization]] is also enabled by ''holoptism''.
-Another link between ''holoptism'' and the [[OVN model|OVN]] is through the fundamental principles of [[transparency]], defined as free access to information about all actions or [[processes]]  within the [[OVN]]. This is further reinforced by the principle of [[openness]], which means free access to participate in any [[process]]. In other words, p2p economics prescribes not only free access to information, but also free access to action, i.e. to do something with that information. The economic rationale is described on the [[peer production]] page, look for Ronals Coase and Yochay Benkler.
+Another link between ''holoptism'' and the [[OVN model|OVN]] is through the fundamental principles of [[transparency]], defined as free access to information about all actions or [[processes]]  within the [[OVN]]. This is further reinforced by the principle of [[openness]], which means free access to participate in any [[process]]. In other words, p2p economics prescribes not only free access to information, but also free access to action, i.e. to do something with that information. The economic rationale is described on the [[economic model]] page, look for Ronals Coase and Yochay Benkler.
 =Anoptism=

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 28 March 2024
Line 29:		Line 29:

	''Holoptism'' is a necessary condition for [[Stigmergy]], which is the primary mode of coordination in p2p. As a corollary of this statement, [[self-organization]] is also enabled by ''holoptism''.		''Holoptism'' is a necessary condition for [[Stigmergy]], which is the primary mode of coordination in p2p. As a corollary of this statement, [[self-organization]] is also enabled by ''holoptism''.
		+
		+	Another link between holoptism and the [[OVN model\|OVN]] is through the fundamental principles of [[transparency]], defined as free access to information about all actions or [[processes]] within the [[OVN]]. This is further reinforced by the principle of [[openness]], which means free access to participate in any [[process]]. In other words, p2p economics prescribes not only free access to information, but also free access to action, i.e. to do something with that information. The economic rationale is described on the [[peer production]] page, see Ronals Coase and Yochay Benkler.

	=Anoptism=		=Anoptism=