Web3 - Revision history

TiberiusB at 19:35, 19 April 2026

2026-04-19T19:35:21Z

2024-07-13T18:11:31Z

More...

2024-07-13T17:29:20Z

TogetherCrew

2024-07-13T17:28:27Z

More...

2024-07-11T19:13:14Z

Web3 apps that relate to the OVN model and to NRP-CAS

2024-07-11T19:11:02Z

Karma.GAP

2024-07-11T19:10:11Z

Coordinape

2024-07-11T19:09:42Z

Coordinape

2024-07-11T19:07:33Z

Coordinape

2024-07-11T19:07:12Z

Coordinape

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 19 April 2026
Line 40:		Line 40:


−	'''Critique''': Relies more on planning than on stigmergy, since this is designed with a proposal-based funding process in mind, for which there is a budget / allocation and milestones already in the plan. Less room for [[stigmergy]].	+	'''Critique''': Relies more on planning than on stigmergy, since this is designed with a proposal-based funding process in mind, for which there is a budget / [[allocation]] and milestones already in the plan. Less room for [[stigmergy]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 13 July 2024
Line 92:		Line 92:
	=More...=		=More...=
	digest / curate more from [https://www.commonseconomy.org/projects CER]		digest / curate more from [https://www.commonseconomy.org/projects CER]
		+
		+	=Web3 primitives=
		+	See [[Web3 primitives]] page.

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 ==TogetherCrew==
-[https://www.togethercrew.com TogetherCrew] offers [[feedback mechanisms]], i.e. analytics that combine data from multiple sources and help actors make sense of the bigger picture. Partner with multiple DAO tooling projects to bridge silos and empower Web3 communities with the best insights. Feeds from data left behind by participants through their activities within digital environments.
+[https://www.togethercrew.com TogetherCrew] offers feedback mechanisms (related to [[feedback system]]), i.e. analytics that combine data from multiple sources and help actors make sense of the bigger picture. Partner with multiple DAO tooling projects to bridge silos and empower Web3 communities with the best insights. Feeds from data left behind by participants through their activities within digital environments.
 Covers from individuals, cliques, community and ecosystem, with the ability to bridge different networks.
@@ Line 88: / Line 88: @@
 '''Critique''': RnDAO leans towards extractive economic systems and organizations.
 =More...=
 digest / curate more from [https://www.commonseconomy.org/projects CER]

@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
 The hypercert itself is an ERC-1155 semi-fungible token with the information above stored as metadata on IPFS. A single hypercert is a semi-fungible token that accounts for work that is supposed to be impactful and whose ownership is fractionizable and transferable (under specific conditions). Hypercerts do not impose any specific funding mechanisms but provide baseline invariant guarantees such that claims will not be forgotten as different mechanisms come into and out of fashion. This is also why hypercerts are especially useful for any retrospective funding mechanisms – funding can be applied to claims of the past.
 =More...=
 digest / curate more from [https://www.commonseconomy.org/projects CER]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
-='''Web3 apps that relate to the [[OVN]] model and to [[NRP-CAS]]'''=
+=Web3 apps that relate to the [[OVN]] model and to [[NRP-CAS]]=
 ==[https://gap.karmahq.xyz/ Karma.GAP]==
@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
 The hypercert itself is an ERC-1155 semi-fungible token with the information above stored as metadata on IPFS. A single hypercert is a semi-fungible token that accounts for work that is supposed to be impactful and whose ownership is fractionizable and transferable (under specific conditions). Hypercerts do not impose any specific funding mechanisms but provide baseline invariant guarantees such that claims will not be forgotten as different mechanisms come into and out of fashion. This is also why hypercerts are especially useful for any retrospective funding mechanisms – funding can be applied to claims of the past.
 =More...=
 digest / curate more from [https://www.commonseconomy.org/projects CER]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 11 July 2024
Line 43:		Line 43:


−	'''Link to NRP-CAS''': This has NRP-CAS functionality such as [[contribution logging]], [[contribution valuation]], [[reputation]] or [[credentials]].	+	'''Link to NRP-CAS''': This has NRP-CAS functionality such as [[Contributions log\|contribution logging]], [[Valuation\|contribution valuation]], [[reputation]] or [[credentials]].
−

	==[https://coordinape.com/ Coordinape]==		==[https://coordinape.com/ Coordinape]==

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 11 July 2024
Line 61:		Line 61:


−	'''Critique''': [[currency]]-centric. Relies on [[planning]], not [[stigmergy]]. Us vs them language, as in those who create a circle and their members. Doesn't speak about how contributions are [[Valuation~~:evaluated~~\|evaluated]] and a mechanism for [[benefit redistribution]].	+	'''Critique''': [[currency]]-centric. Relies on [[planning]], not [[stigmergy]]. Us vs them language, as in those who create a circle and their members. Doesn't speak about how contributions are [[Valuation\|evaluated]] and a mechanism for [[benefit redistribution]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 11 July 2024
Line 61:		Line 61:


−	'''Critique''': [[currency]]-centric. Relies on [[planning]], not [[stigmergy]]. Us vs them language, as in those who create a circle and their members. Doesn't speak about how contributions are [Valuation: evaluated] and a mechanism for [[benefit redistribution]].	+	'''Critique''': [[currency]]-centric. Relies on [[planning]], not [[stigmergy]]. Us vs them language, as in those who create a circle and their members. Doesn't speak about how contributions are [[Valuation:evaluated\|evaluated]] and a mechanism for [[benefit redistribution]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 11 July 2024
Line 61:		Line 61:


−	'''Critique''': [[currency]]-centric. Relies on [[planning]], not [[stigmergy]]. Us vs them language, as in those who create a circle and their members. Doesn't speak about how contributions are [[Valuation: evaluated]] and a mechanism for [[benefit redistribution]].	+	'''Critique''': [[currency]]-centric. Relies on [[planning]], not [[stigmergy]]. Us vs them language, as in those who create a circle and their members. Doesn't speak about how contributions are [Valuation: evaluated] and a mechanism for [[benefit redistribution]].