Difference between revisions of "Sponsor"

From OVN wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "... to be added...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
... to be added...
+
... to be completed...
 +
 
 +
[[Sensorica]] has distinguished between ''Support'' and ''Service'' [[ventures]]:
 +
 
 +
Structurally, the distinction between a ''Support venture'' and a ''Service venture'' is that in the case of ''Service'' there is a transactional relation established between a '''Client''' and the [[venture]], mediated by a [[Custodian]]. In the case of ''Support'', the [[venture]] enters into a collaborative relation with another party, a ''Sponsor'', often a traditional organization, forming a larger network. This collaborative relation is not transactional in nature, in the sense that both, the [[venture]] and the Sponsor deploy efforts and resources for a common goal, complementing each other. In both cases, the outcome is intended for the commons, bringing into the relation a third party, the World. In terms of infrastructure and methods, in the case of the ''Service-type'' relation the ''Client'' doesn’t share the same development or production environment and coordination and communication are ensured by a lead affiliate, i.e. a liaison individual. The [[venture]] and the ''Client''. In the case of the ''Support-type'' relation, there is a great overlap of ''Sponsor''’s and [[venture]]’s activities within a shared infrastructure (often provided by the OVN), making them effectively form a new organization with very tight and intertwined coordination and collaboration.

Latest revision as of 16:42, 20 August 2026

... to be completed...

Sensorica has distinguished between Support and Service ventures:

Structurally, the distinction between a Support venture and a Service venture is that in the case of Service there is a transactional relation established between a Client and the venture, mediated by a Custodian. In the case of Support, the venture enters into a collaborative relation with another party, a Sponsor, often a traditional organization, forming a larger network. This collaborative relation is not transactional in nature, in the sense that both, the venture and the Sponsor deploy efforts and resources for a common goal, complementing each other. In both cases, the outcome is intended for the commons, bringing into the relation a third party, the World. In terms of infrastructure and methods, in the case of the Service-type relation the Client doesn’t share the same development or production environment and coordination and communication are ensured by a lead affiliate, i.e. a liaison individual. The venture and the Client. In the case of the Support-type relation, there is a great overlap of Sponsor’s and venture’s activities within a shared infrastructure (often provided by the OVN), making them effectively form a new organization with very tight and intertwined coordination and collaboration.