Difference between revisions of "Agent"

From OVN wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Agents are individual entities that have the ability to plan and take actions. Agents can be individual humans, software acting on behalf of an individual or group (e.g., an [[Ethereum]] client), or a group of multiple agents (an [[organization]]).
+
Anything that can perform an action. Has agency, i.e. can also plan, to take actions.
  
An agent operates within an OVN.  
+
Agents can be individuals, groups, projects, networks. Agents can also be bots, machines (IoT)
  
In [[REA]] or [[NRP-CAS]] language we can say that [[resources]] are used in [[events]] by ''agents''.
 
  
In an OVN, ''agents'' that [[contribute]] to [[processes]] are [[affiliates]].
+
=Related to REA / NRP=
  
 +
In the REA / NRP language we have ''users'' and ''economic agents''.
  
NOTE: In a p2p context it is not advised to reduce agents or [[affiliates]] to ''users'', as it is used in discussions about online centralized platforms such as Facebook or Twitter. The difference is that ''users'' in that context have no control over the platform.
+
A ''user'' is linked to an account, it is credentials to access the NRP.
 +
 
 +
A ''economic agent'' can represent an individual, a [[project]] / [[venture]], another network or even a traditional organization. Economic agents (or simply agents) ca  be of various types: ''agent type''. 
 +
 
 +
An ''agents'' that [[contribute]] to [[processes]] are [[affiliates]]. Furthermore, [[affiliates]] have [[profiles]], can form a digital [[identity]], and that in the case of a [[NRP-CAS]] as a platform (server-client architecture) ''user'' is the credentials to access the platform.
 +
 
 +
We can say that [[resources]] are used in [[events]] by ''agents'' (hence REA).
 +
 
 +
=User vs agent=
 +
 
 +
The term ''user'' is used in the context of online centralized platforms such as Facebook or Twitter. The ''users'' in these contexts have no control over the platform, they are provided the platform as a service, in exchange of user data produced through interactions within the platform, which can be monetized elsewhere by the platform owners.
 +
 
 +
''User'' also has a local connotation, as an ''agent'' within a specific application. ''Agent'' is used in a more generic sense that can transcend the local contexts. 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
In a p2p context it is not advised to reduce agents or [[affiliates]] to ''users''.

Latest revision as of 17:59, 27 May 2022

Anything that can perform an action. Has agency, i.e. can also plan, to take actions.

Agents can be individuals, groups, projects, networks. Agents can also be bots, machines (IoT)


Related to REA / NRP

In the REA / NRP language we have users and economic agents.

A user is linked to an account, it is credentials to access the NRP.

A economic agent can represent an individual, a project / venture, another network or even a traditional organization. Economic agents (or simply agents) ca be of various types: agent type.

An agents that contribute to processes are affiliates. Furthermore, affiliates have profiles, can form a digital identity, and that in the case of a NRP-CAS as a platform (server-client architecture) user is the credentials to access the platform.

We can say that resources are used in events by agents (hence REA).

User vs agent

The term user is used in the context of online centralized platforms such as Facebook or Twitter. The users in these contexts have no control over the platform, they are provided the platform as a service, in exchange of user data produced through interactions within the platform, which can be monetized elsewhere by the platform owners.

User also has a local connotation, as an agent within a specific application. Agent is used in a more generic sense that can transcend the local contexts.


In a p2p context it is not advised to reduce agents or affiliates to users.