Free initiative

From OVN wiki
Revision as of 02:20, 20 September 2022 by TiberiusB (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is about one's ability to do something (initiate a process or contribute to an existing one) without the need for approval.

A good initiative is one that increases the probability to improve the organisation or its products, and by the same token increases the probability for additional benefits for affiliates. A "bad" initiative is one that causes harm to the organisation as a whole or to some of its affiliates. Sometimes we perceive as bad initiatives those that are not intended to cause harm, but might be wasteful (in terms of utilization of resources). Usually, this type of initiatives don't attract attention or resources to go forward, but there is no penalty for trying. The OVN is a Darwinian environment for ideas, in which the good ones get traction and the bad ones are neglected and forgotten. An good initiative that fails is still a learning opportunity.

Rationale: Reduce bureaucracy, lower barriers to innovation, agile, fail fast.

The governance model that takes free initiative to the extreme is called a doacracy, i.e. the power of doers, those who do, who take initiative.

Important note: Some actions require very little effort but can be harmful and even irreversible. Such actions are vectors of attack. In these cases free initiative should be closely watched, peer reviewed and potentially sanctioned. For example, publishing something that can tarnish the reputation of the OVN, using the OVN's brand in a harmful way, as if it is done in the name of the OVN, false representation.


Some conditions must be fulfilled in order for free initiative to become a benefit rather than a burden

  • The value system is transparent and legible, everyone can see the big picture.
  • A transparent reputation system is in place.
  • The digital environment provides tools for sharing and broadcasting new intentions and allows affiliates to monitor, discuss, contribute or red flag.
  • All initiatives are open to allow others to participate, to correct the development path, to provide alternatives, and even to red flag (oppose and stop).

It is the responsibility of the initiator to rally support and resources for his/her initiative. The individual choices of members with higher reputation will have an impact on other members. This is how skills, talent and capacity are attracted to the process.